<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ignorance as the Greatest Virtue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/</link>
	<description>A blog on nature, science, religion, and just about anything else I want to post on</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>When "this one thing" is the point of the article, I'd say that the odds are just fine... Still Fred, I'm not trying to be disrespectful to you, but in this case, I just don't see the article as facetious. We may just have to agree to disagree on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When &#8220;this one thing&#8221; is the point of the article, I&#8217;d say that the odds are just fine&#8230; Still Fred, I&#8217;m not trying to be disrespectful to you, but in this case, I just don&#8217;t see the article as facetious. We may just have to agree to disagree on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>What are the odds that in the midst of all those jokes (or, rather, "lightheartedness" or "tongue in cheekness") that he's serious about this one thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the odds that in the midst of all those jokes (or, rather, &#8220;lightheartedness&#8221; or &#8220;tongue in cheekness&#8221;) that he&#8217;s serious about this one thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>Yes Fred, I've read the article completely. (Actually several times, in trying to be fair to your comments and Gibson).

&lt;blockquote&gt;
He’s making jokes the whole time. And since the beginning of a piece sets up its theme, and his piece opens humorously, how can you not accept the entire piece as humor?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because one uses humor throughout a piece does not necessarily mean that one is being sarcastic or facetious about the thesis of an article. Despite his overall humor, I see none that indicates he's joking about his point -- which is (to paraphrase) "I don't care what scientists say, Pluto is still a planet."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Fred, I&#8217;ve read the article completely. (Actually several times, in trying to be fair to your comments and Gibson).</p>
<blockquote><p>
He’s making jokes the whole time. And since the beginning of a piece sets up its theme, and his piece opens humorously, how can you not accept the entire piece as humor?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Because one uses humor throughout a piece does not necessarily mean that one is being sarcastic or facetious about the thesis of an article. Despite his overall humor, I see none that indicates he&#8217;s joking about his point &#8212; which is (to paraphrase) &#8220;I don&#8217;t care what scientists say, Pluto is still a planet.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>Jay, have you read the whole piece?  He's making jokes the whole time.  And since the beginning of a piece sets up its theme, and his piece opens humorously, how can you not accept the entire piece as humor?  Sarcastic and facetious.  Of course, that doesn't mean it's successful and funny, but I don't think there's any doubt that that's what it's attempting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, have you read the whole piece?  He&#8217;s making jokes the whole time.  And since the beginning of a piece sets up its theme, and his piece opens humorously, how can you not accept the entire piece as humor?  Sarcastic and facetious.  Of course, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s successful and funny, but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any doubt that that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s attempting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>I don't. I'm sorry, but there's nothing in that piece that tells me it's facetious. Yes, I see that he think's he's being quite humorous by pointing out that Pluto's a dog... But his point -- that he's not going to let scientists decide for him that Pluto's not a planet -- seems to be a sober one.

So Fred, how do you know (and how would you convince me) that it's "just a light little comic piece"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t. I&#8217;m sorry, but there&#8217;s nothing in that piece that tells me it&#8217;s facetious. Yes, I see that he think&#8217;s he&#8217;s being quite humorous by pointing out that Pluto&#8217;s a dog&#8230; But his point &#8212; that he&#8217;s not going to let scientists decide for him that Pluto&#8217;s not a planet &#8212; seems to be a sober one.</p>
<p>So Fred, how do you know (and how would you convince me) that it&#8217;s &#8220;just a light little comic piece&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>OK.  That is good news!  I gladly take it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.  That is good news!  I gladly take it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>Um, I hate to tell you, but that article by Gibson was facetious; just a light little comic piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I hate to tell you, but that article by Gibson was facetious; just a light little comic piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocellated.com/2006/09/05/ignorance-as-the-greatest-virtue/#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>His ignorance of the process is amazing.  And he gets big bucks for being so ill informed.  I was kind of disappointed that Pluto was dropped.  I'm not really sure why I had such affection for it being a planet.  But my rational side understands how scientific bodies have to assess these situations and must come up with standardized guidelines and rules and conventions in order to bring order to what could become chaos.  I wouldn't argue that processes like this are perfect.  But they are not completely arbitrary either.  I laughed at your planetary physicist in a bunker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His ignorance of the process is amazing.  And he gets big bucks for being so ill informed.  I was kind of disappointed that Pluto was dropped.  I&#8217;m not really sure why I had such affection for it being a planet.  But my rational side understands how scientific bodies have to assess these situations and must come up with standardized guidelines and rules and conventions in order to bring order to what could become chaos.  I wouldn&#8217;t argue that processes like this are perfect.  But they are not completely arbitrary either.  I laughed at your planetary physicist in a bunker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
